Technical & Operational Due Diligence
For investors, boards, and founders making a consequential technical decision: an acquisition, funding round, senior hire, technical direction, or recovery plan.
The work tests the engineering reality, the delivery capability, the operating structure, and the gap between what a company says it has and what the evidence supports. The objective is not a flattering technical summary. It is a decision-ready view of what is credible, fragile, fixable, or structurally wrong.
A technical claim can be true and still be commercially useless. A strong prototype can still lack an owner, a viable delivery model, secure data handling, or a team capable of maintaining it. These are operating questions as much as engineering questions.
Is the architecture coherent, maintainable, secure enough for its context, and capable of supporting the claimed product or service?
RealityCan the team actually deliver and maintain what is promised, or is the roadmap dependent on assumptions that have not survived contact with reality?
CapabilityDo ownership, process, data handling, sales promises, and delivery fit together, or are they creating risk that the technical narrative hides?
RiskWhat should be funded, fixed, renegotiated, delayed, or stopped before the next commitment is made?
ActionEach diligence engagement is scoped to the decision at hand. It can cover architecture, AI claims, delivery capability, operating risk, technical hiring, or a combination of those questions.
This is not legal, tax, financial, or investment advice, and it does not replace specialist diligence in those areas. Where a decision needs those disciplines, the technical and operating read should sit beside them.
The judgment behind the read comes from operating, not observing: the record is on the CV and in the case studies. When the company in question is your own, the entry point is the two-week operating diagnostic or founder and operator mentoring.
Describe the commitment you are about to make. I will tell you whether an independent technical and operational read is useful, and what it should cover.
Discuss the decision →